7.29.2004

CALL ME A SUCKER FOR CONVENTION RHETORIC: This time from a Dallas airport lounge...

Okay, so now I'm listing Kerryward. An e-mail to Andrew Sullivan summarizes my feelings nicely. An excerpt:

"I'm a social libertarian, fiscally conservative, hawk -- an eagle, in your lexicon. In the past, I've been willing to give Democrats a chance. I voted for Clinton in 1992, although I soon regretted it. Since 9/11, I've morphed into a one-issue voter -- the war on terrorism, at home and abroad. And until recently, my efforts to be open to John Kerry ran aground whenever I considered who the terrorists would rather see elected. And my anxiety only intensified after recent reports on pre-election terrorism attacks. Surely the terrorists' rationale for such attacks would be to help elect Kerry, a la Spain. I'm not sure American voters would react the way Spaniards did, but the terrorists may not appreciate the resolve of the American heartland.But if the terrorists were listening to Edwards last night, and Obama the night before, they may be second-guessing their plans. If the Kerry camp's war rhetoric is in earnest (and there are good reasons to doubt it), then the terrorists may not get the easier ride they were strategizing for."

Go read the whole thing. Well worth it. Bottom line is if I believed Kerry was every bit as hawkish on terror as Bush (just smarter), and if I believed Kerry favored personal responsibility and accountabilty over government subsidy/assistance, then he's my guy. He's obviously smarter, more courageous, and more qualified than our current president.

One thing that still pisses me off are the literal nobs who keep acting as if Bush is some sort of evil genius (even as they call him an idiot), some kind of grand-plan conspiracy master who's managed to create a profitable new chaos for himself and his best pals the Bin Ladens.

So even though I may -- MAY -- vote Kerry, I'll still think Michael Moore is just as big, fat and idiotic as Rush Limbaugh, and that the Hollyweird liberal set (for which Timothy Robbins and Sean Penn have become poster boys) are pompous poopheads.

Oh, and liked that spiked Ann Coulter column, even though I'm generally no fan of hers. Go figure.


7.25.2004

WHERE I BE? I was at my 20th high school reunion over the long weekend. So much to process and maybe even post about. But just thought I should let my few faithful readers know why I've been quiet for the past few days. More from the road on the 'morrow, as my week launches off to the Big Apple and the Big D. See you back here soon...

7.21.2004

NEVER BE IDLE: Oh, great. So in-flight cell phones are just over the horizon. Before long it'll be normal to e-mail, call, and just generally be productive on the flight. Joy.

What's next? Stair-steppers attached to the barber chair? Laptops embedded under massage tables? Constant productivity is way overrated.

RECALLING THE WHITE FLAG: Okay, so I don't give up on the Cubs. I take it back. But man-oh-man were they embarassing yesterday. I was so thrilled to see them put eight runs on Matt Morris early...and then I sat there in disbelief as they found various ways the rest of the game to play bad and look worse, resulting in a backbreaking loss.

Still, there was that little glimmer in the ninth where I sensed they just might come back. And so I started feeling bad about my post, my early white flag. Thing is this team is still dead-center in the wildcard race, still a formidable club that can beat anyone on any given day.

So now I'm looking for Hendry to make a deal. We need a shortstop and some bullpen help, for sure. We could probably use another super-sub, given that Hollandsworth may be out for a while and Aramis is a gimp. C'mon, Hendry. Nose back to grindstone. Phone to shoulder. I promise not to give up if you don't.

Meanwhile, it's time to see some character from this team. No more temper tantrums. No more excuses. Let's see how big a dent we can put into St. Looey's 10-game lead. Let's see how quickly we can lock up the wildcard. And let's see a chance for vengeance against those Cardinals in the playoffs. Heck, screw vengeance. Let's redeem ourselves, earn back some of the respect that was handed away in the past 48 hours.

7.20.2004

I AM A BIG SUCKER: The Cubs have totally self-destructed in the past 24 hours. Miserable. Is it hockey season yet?
 
Thank God NASCAR revs it up again this weekend. I need a diversion.

7.19.2004

SEMANTICS: I agree with Schwarzenegger, although I don't think he should have used the term "girly men." "Great big pussies" might have been more apt.

7.16.2004

CYBER-SISTERS AND ME: I guess I disagree pretty evenly with BOTH of my sisters-in-law from time to time. Still, they're both great people, both interesting and smart. All the Hess boys have been lucky in love.
 
One of the sisters-in-law, Paula, writes phaneromania, among other things. The other, Laurel, is a frequent Blind Camel reader and commenter, and now she's started to do the same on Paula's blog. Right now, we're all weighing in on a discussion of fraternity/sorority life, pro and con, etc. A pretty amazing thing that we can have this conversation in this way...

BLOGGER BETTER: Looks like Blogger has really improved the "Edit Posting" interface, with all manner of easy, training-wheels tags for losers like me. Check it out:




"This is a blockquote."
- Scott Hess

 
You can also do colors...
 
center text
 
Make numbered lists...
 
  1. Look!
  2. Like this!
  3. Not bad.

No big deal, but I'm happy 'bout it.

7.15.2004

BLAH BLAH BLAH: I got to hang out in the pits and the garages at the Chicagoland Speedway, in advance of last Saturday's Tropicana 400 (NASCAR) race. I met and shook hands with my favorite driver, Jimmy Johnson, and I stood about a foot away from most of the cars that would later hurtle around the track at around 200 MPH. Then I watched the race itself from a corporate box above the start/finish line, and I won $250 in a pick-the-winner pool. (I blindly drew race winner and controversy-hound Tony Stewart.)

I spent Monday and Tuesday in the Pacific Northwest, nestled in amidst mountains and tall trees. Oh, and there's water flowing here, there, and everywhere. Very pretty.

Yesterday I flew first class back from Seattle and sat next to a young, smart United pilot. He answered a bunch of my dumb questions about flying, and he told me turbulence to a pilot is just like waves to a guy driving a boat: no big deal, just something you have to maneuver through. He made several analogies between air and water, and said driving a plane is also alot like driving a submarine. Anyway, for this nervous flyer, it was a big help to hear from a guy who lives half his life aloft.

What else? I'm glad Bush's gay-marriage amendment got smashed. I'm glad Tony Blair is off the hook in the UK, just as Bush is (or should be) here. (I'm referring to the two recent intelligence inquiries that found that the pre-war intelligence was faulty, not the leaders' judgement.) Neither one of these guys acted recklessly in sending troops to oust Hussein. That's my view and I'm sticking with it. I think the two inquiries support that view.

I listened to the Smiths "Heaven Knows I'm Miserable Now" in the car today, and I laughed out loud. "I was looking for a job and then I found a job/And heaven knows I'm miserable now." Indeed!

7.14.2004

LIVE FROM SOFTWARE CENTRAL: Little to say today, save for the fact that, ironically, I'm on via dialup from Bellevue, WA, just a short jaunt away from the software capitol of the world: Redmond.

Some of my stress fell away yesterday, and some of it lingers. I've had the good sense to go running each of the last two mornings, and it's true there's no substitute for exercise when you need to clear a cloudy mind. Still, what's plaguing me is more central, the question of how to spend my fleeting life and time. I have the best job I've ever had, in many respects, and still I'm not very happy. The good news is I can see the solution...now it's just a matter of enacting it.

Sucks to have to have this blog be so veiled, eh? I've never been as good with the reckless public disclosure stuff as some of my blogging brethren. For better and for worse, I'm sure.

7.12.2004

LIVE FROM LUMBER COUNTRY: Online from Portland (Oregon) today. Have been re-learning lessons about stress and how it can manifest itself in a million different ways. More on that when I have a free moment. In the meantime, let me simply note that it's awfully pretty out here this time of year. My view is framed by mountains and washed in green, gold, and a sleepy brown.

7.09.2004

VOICE OF REASON? Am listening to a CNN press conference about the Senate Intelligence Committee report on WMD in Iraq and am struck by how impressive and reasonable the committee chair, Kansas senator Pat Roberts, comes across. He's old and not especially telegenic...but he seems "presidential" as hell. I'm gonna keep my eye on the guy. Maybe he actually favors stem-cell research and same-sex marriage.

A BETTER MAC ATTACK: Here's a better evaluation of what's wrong with the Mac show.

STINKERMAN: Hit the 12:01AM showing of Will Ferrell's new ANCHORMAN tonight (this morning) across the street from the hotel. Sadly, it was just as I suspected. More dumb than funny. Sure, there are some moments. I'm too tired to recount them. Before I retire, though, it's my duty to tell you this: Wait for HBO, or at the very least, BLOCKBUSTER. This is lighter fare than even ELF or OLD SCHOOL. This ninety-minute movie had less big belly laughs than a single SNL skit. A few good sight gags and cameos, a couple funny facial expressions and ad-libbed lines, but in general a sprawling mess of a costume comedy stretched three times too long.

MAC IS BACK AND STILL SUCKS: The second night of MCENROE was nearly as awful as the first. Mac seems to be scolding more than hosting the show. Somehow he turned telling Ralph Nader that he'd voted for him in the last election into a harangue, and he made it seem like Nader was only there to hawk his book. (Mac would grudgingly wave it around at odd intervals.)

Next came the ridiculous Lars and James from Metallica. Lars is about 5'2" and extra dorky, hardly the brooding, intense rock drummer of legend. And James is a gangly lerch, sort of like a stretched-out Jeff Bagwell with an extra helping of self-consciousness. They were shilling for their documentary, which came across as unwittingly comical (a sort of real-life SPINAL TAP), when they seemed to be aiming for poignant.

Finally Mac grumped at Karch Kiraly, the aging beach volleyballer. It was a mess. A mess, I tell you.

7.08.2004

ONE SHINING MOMENT: Okay, there was one highlight on the miserable MCENROE debut last night. Asked to explain how he's managed to stay in such good shape all these years, Sting thought about it and replied: "Vanity."

Of course that didn't make up for the "it can't get any worse -- oh no, it's getting worse" nature of the rest of the show. The finale -- Johnny Mac playing audibly poor guitar (for gosh sakes, if he sucks just turn him down! worked for Bob Weir) backing his wife -- was creepy, awkward, and hard to watch. As the credits rolled to the strains of "Goodbye to You" (with Sting attempted to lend ear-cupped backing vocals) one could hardly muster anything but sympathy for the tennis brat and his television brethren.

7.07.2004

THIS SHOW CANNOT BE SERIOUS: Am about twenty minutes into watching the trainwreck that is the MCENROE show on CNBC. Although I've been a McEnroe fan over the years, there's no denying he's more wooden than Trump, more awkward than Chevy, and more impatient than...well, I mean, his timing is horrendous. He's almost annoyed at the audience as they clap and laugh at Will Ferrell. Johnny Mac is so unfunny and uncomfortable he's almost destroying Ferrell's dead-center comedic genius. Unreal.

FROM A GARDEN STATE STARBUCKS: More randomness from the road, maybe this time on men and male friends and such. Because when it's time for a husband to fall apart a little bit, to be uncertain or stressed, to seem less than powerful, to spend a moment outside the bounds of traditional masculinity -- and let's say the husband is just tired, has spent too much time on the road, has spent too little time sleeping, and is finding his brain so fully occupied by work so as to squeeze out the other more important stuff -- who is he to turn to? I'd argue he shouldn't turn to his pregnant wife. I'd argue she has enough on her mind, that she looks to her husband for power and certitude and will be uncomfortable seeing him a mess.

And thus the need for strong male friendships, for having guy friends who will listen to and allow your gripes and doubts, and who will reveal their own.

But who has time for friends?

Something's not entirely right with this equation. Love the job, hate the lifestyle. Something's gotta give, and rather than writing about it here I need to be talking about it in a concrete building in Northbrook, Illinois.

Read this post now and fast, 'cause it's probably coming down sometime soon.

7.06.2004


WHAT YOU TALKIN' BOUT, CAMEL? No, Morgan, I didn't spend the weekend in the Denver airport lounge.

Instead it was a whirlwind weekend, with family in from the Detroit-ish area and all manner of outbound events (the Lincoln Park Zoo, the Chicago Botanic Garden, a mom-mandated trip to Chipotle, etc.) on our schedule (pronounced "shed-yule").

Don't know where to start so I'll just start...

Woke up sweaty at 4AM...actually, wait...went to bed at an unchacteristically early 9:30PM last night and, given my current work schedule and recent habit of late nights and early flights (wow, that would be a great yuppie album title: LATE NIGHTS AND EARLY FLIGHTS), woke up sweaty and ready to work at 1:15AM. (Another great yuppie record title: SWEATY AND READY TO WORK; could also work as a porno title.)

So at 1AMish my dog Vladi was conducting his nightly toe-nail-noisy shuffle from the bathroom tiles onto the hardwood and then plopping onto his understuffed bed with a leaky sigh. I knew how he felt. My lower back was sore from doing basically nothing but living, I was sweaty from humidity and a 12-hour decongestant, and I was running through my upcoming itineraries and deadlines in my brain. Somehow I drifted off again into a sweaty dreamscape for another three hours or so, but at 4AM I knew there were no more slumbers coming for this blogger. I adjourned to my study, checked the weather and sunrise time on my computer (this despite the fact I'm an avowed non weather-checker), then set off for an hour walk-jog around my little corner of Chicago.

I thought of a David Eggers piece I read yesterday in SPIN, a sort of celebration of the band Big Country, especially their album THE CROSSING. And I remembered thinking, as I read it, that Eggers is not a better writer than me (okay, okay, feel free to pot-shot me here and now, readers), but that he's just more fearless and honest. Celebrating Big Country, a band most take for one-hit wonders! What stones, I thought as I came across the article. This Eggers will write about anything.

And then I read it and I know he's right, he's right, and I start mentally digging for my Big Country discs, all part of the Great Unwashed Music Pile (GUMP) that litters my study and the basement and my car's trunk, so much so that I've considered hiring someone to sort through and re-case and re-file all my wayward music. I come across the song "In a Big Country" on my wife's 80's disc as I drove home last night, and it is almost too poignant to be true: "I'm not expecting to grow flowers in a desert, but I can live and breathe and see the sun in wintertime." Amen, Stuart.

So many other things came to me, visited me on my walk, to the extent that I remembered thinking on some earlier walk that I should never be walkless again, because walks are when my brain has a chance to defragment, to clean up lost clusters and/or find new hard disk space for future memories.

Bought two new discs last night (and I thought this morning about the phrase "chasing the dragon," meant to describe how drug addicts [especially crackheads] are constantly re-seeking that high, the feeling, trying to "get normal" by catching the dragon's tail [you know, the firebreather, the crack pipe] just one more time, and I thought how that's sort of like how I buy records and books, hoping that maybe just one of them will hit just the right note, get me off the consumption treadmill, answer The Question), the new one from The Cure and then a new one from some group called PepLab. And the first sounds like it should and will hopefully grow on me, but the second is just a full-on dance party right out of the box, what the label sticker describes as Rick James meets Crystal Method. It fulfills the "soundtrack for a big black car" requirement, music that complements the leather seats and the lightly tinted windows and my chin-down driving style. In the words of Freddie "Boom Boom" Washington, it's music that has a certain "Hi there" quality.

My two-year-old son answers the following questions expertly:

Q: What does Ed McMahon say?
A: Hi-O!

Q: What does Hank Kingsley say?
A: Hey now!

Q: What does Fonzie say?
A: Aaaaaaayyyyyyyyy!

Q: What does Mork from Ork say?
A: Shazbat.

Q: What does Gary Coleman say?
A: What you talking 'bout Willis?

7.02.2004

LINGERING IN THE LOUNGE: Chillin' in the Denver airport Red Carpet Club, eating mini-bagels schmeared with mixed fruit spread. I'm just about the only guy in here, and I can't help but think this might be a good place for a vacation. Although there's not much to eat, there are current newspapers, a bar, TVs everywhere, wireless Internet, etc. They should sell memberships to stressed parents. You get a babysitter, stash some take-out in some luggage, and head over to the Red Carpet Club during off-hours. It's like a little oasis of calm...and the fact that it's plopped into the middle of a bustling airport makes that calm all the more exquisite.

6.30.2004

BLATHER: Was planning on an 8:00AM flight to BWI this morning, so I had a cab scheduled for 6:15. He showed up early, traffic was nil, and I breezed through security...and jumped on a 6:35 flight. Awesome ease! So now I'm in Baltimore six hours early. Maybe I'll head over the local Starbucks and do wireless from there. This hotel room is freezing.

6.29.2004

GET BACK IN THE ARMY! I remember the Bushies telling us that maintaining a military presence in Afghanistan and in Iraq at the same time would not strech the military too thin. This article says otherwise. Good gracious. Ugh. I have never felt so torn before an election.

MIRA'S MESSY MAN: What is it about the "dirty elf" look that chicks dig? Little head, stubble, bizarre hat and/or shaggy hair-do...ala Johnny Depp, Hayden Christiansen, Orlando Bloom, and now this guy? Come to think of it, Justin Timberlake kinda has that dirty elf vibe, too.

OUR BLOGS COULD BE YOUR LIFE: So now Blind Camel regular Trisha has a blog, too, and I see that yesterday's hero Morgan Worth is already commenting there. Maybe Blind Camel can be the Velvet Underground of blogs, the blog that launched a thousand blogs...

Or maybe it's more like the Grow Bugs of blogs, which was a really bad band I was in in college that played mostly covers and had more to do with parties than it did with music. Alas...

BTW, Trisha's blog is called the least of my worries, but it's hosted at netsmarts.net. Which leads me to this Gary Colemanesque query:

What you talkin' bout, Trisha?

Oh, and there's this, too:

My sister-in-law (and stealth Blind Camel reader) Paula also has a new blog, called phaneromania. It's quite nice, and y'all should check it out, too, whilst you're just procrastinating.

LADIES LAST: I like etiquette, doing the right things socially so that you don't look like a simp. I do. Sure, in our liberated world, where guys and gals are working side-by-side and nobody wants to be politically incorrect, it can be tough to do the right thing. Sometimes it's best just to pretend we're all gender-neutral action figures. But most of the time I still try to use the classic "Miss Manners" protocol, and I find I'm one of the only people left in the world that knows the real "rules."

One thing that really bugs me is elevator etiquette. The right way to do it? Guy gets in first, holds the door for the ladies, presses the appropriate floor for them. Guy moves to the back of the elevator so the ladies can get out first. Does it usually go down like that? Nope.

Just this morning at my building some guy dramatically steps back to let some ladies in first. I happened to be close to the elevator, and I happened to know the PROPER etiquette, so I jumped onboard and held the door...and got a dirty look from the guy and the ladies. Hello!?

The other one that always bugs me is the revolving door thing. Guys are supposed to enter revolving doors first, pushing the door around for the ladies. But everytime I step into the revolver first (in mixed company) it seems like I get all manner of ugly stares from men and women alike.

I'd like to buy billboards in every major city, or a Super Bowl ad, or something, so I could just blast the truth out there:

Polite guys get in elevators and revolving doors first! Dumb guys stand back and let the ladies in! Duh!

6.28.2004

HE IS SPUDBOY, HEAR HIM ROAR: My old pal Morgan Worth has a cool blog you should wander by: Swallow Everything. Check it out. When you're reading him, bear in mind that he's a long tall drink o'water with big eyes and an infectious enthusiasm. Cheers to Morgan!

6.25.2004

ABSOLUTELY GREAT READ: Am just about to finish David Lipsky's wonderful ABSOLUTELY AMERICAN, an apolitical account of a class's four-year trek through West Point. Believe it or not, the book grew out of a piece the Army itself pitched to Rolling Stone magazine, and editor/icon Jann Wenner originally envisioned it as a hatchet piece on the military. Instead, Lipsky, a self-confessed military doubter, penned what is at the very least a tribute to the men and women he more or less lives with for four years, and may even be a tribute to the military system in which they live and prosper. A tremendous book, a real page-turner of a nonfiction work. (An illuminating interview with Lipsky is here. Interviewer Dave Weich agrees that the book is an amazingly clear-eyed account of of a loaded subject. He writes, "Again, I come back to the absence of a loaded political agenda in the book. In that sense, it's very different from most of what gets published and promoted today. So much of what we see, or so much of what sells, is either Ann Coulter or Michael Moore. You know what you're going to hear before you even open the cover. Instead, Absolutely American is a story about people and values and commitment.")

6.23.2004

THE REAGAN LEGACY? I'm in a San Diego hotel room listening to Ron Reagan on Larry King. He's carefully unpacking the idiocy behind the Bush administration's ban on stem cell research. He's very compelling and likeable. In fact, I'd say he's done more to sway me towards Kerry than anyone else. Ironic, eh?

6.22.2004

HITCHENS 1, MOORE 0: Please to be checking out Christopher Hitchens' marvelous disembowelment of Michael Moore. For some sick reason I'd love to see the two old wheezers in a real live slugfest sometime.

SNOOZEAPALOOZA: I'm with independent concert promoter Seth Hurwitz, as quoted in the New York Times story on the cancellation of Lollapalooza. In real estate, the mantra is location location location. For big festivals, it's about lineup lineup lineup.

The reason this year's festival couldn't motivate people to buy tickets was its limp lineup. Morrissey's new record flat-out blows, and Sonic Youth are the most boring wankfest of a band since the Godchaux-era Grateful Dead. P.J. Harvey is a critic's darling but has never been a big draw (literary pretensions, no hooks? small crowds). Modest Mouse's Isaac whatever-his-name-is yells too much, and them Flaming Lips dudes make good studio records but bad live performers.

Plus, c'mon...after a decade of these megaconcerts, most of us have learned that standing outside all day in some corporate shed is about as much fun as working at Taco Bell with a keg-beer hangover.

6.21.2004

HOWDY: I've gone quiet of late because I've been traveling -- Los Angeles, Las Vegas, New York, and Miami in the last ten days or so -- and because I've felt I have nothing to say.

Today was dull, but then tonight got better.

The rain stopped as I pulled up in front of my house and the sun extemporaneously warmed the soggy green canopy that is my street. The air rippled with humidity and lurid photosynthesizing, and the smell of damp chlorophyll rose from thousands of sated plant forms...

Etcetera. It was nice.

Now my ten-year-old Airedale Terrier, Vladi, is spread-eagled on the bathroom tile, flatulent and twitchy. I've just drank two cans of Schlitz while watching a Shane MacGowan documentary, and I set my cab pickup for 6:10AM -- or "six-tan-yam" as the Southern dispatcher pronounced it. It's time for bed, but I felt I needed to break my silence here. More from San Diego tomorrow. I'm there the next couple days.

6.15.2004

ADVENTURES IN MARRIAGE: When you marry a guy named after a gun and his only file photo shows him with a bandana drawn gang-style across his face...well, I'm not saying you get what you deserve, but you gotta know he ain't gonna be Ward Cleaver.

6.10.2004

TODAY: I'm camped out in the LAX Hilton lobby for the next several hours, then doing some focus groups, then catching a late flight over to Vegas for the weekend. This lobby is bustling with international flight crews. What a subculture! A whole lot of jet-setting young people eyeing one another and speaking with funny accents. Meanwhile I'm trying to stay awake, not eat too many pretzels, and imagine myself staying up past midnight at the blackjack table.

6.09.2004

RALL RAILS AGAINST REAGAN: I find Ted Rall so loathsome I can barely stand it. It's to the point that I'll never get his message because the messenger is such a putz.

6.08.2004

CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT, LESSON #371: Avoid suing your customers, if at all possible.

J. WHO? I wouldn't admit it either.

TOUGH MORNING: It starts with me having my umpteenth high school reunion dream. This time it focuses on my Ohio reunion, although a week or so ago it was about my Michigan reunion. (I did two years at each high school. My 20th reunions for both schools are in the next couple months, and I'm planning to attend both.)

In the dream I come upon a table of people I knew in high school, although not necessarily friends of mine. I recognize them all, greeting them by name and/or nickname, but none of them seem to recognize me. One of them, a guy who wasn't even in my class, gives me a book he's written. All of a sudden it starts to beep, startling me. They all laugh.

"There's an alarm built into the book," one guy explains through chuckles.

I realize I'm dreaming, and slowly it dawns on me that my alarm is going off on the nightstand next to my head. I swat it off. My wife wakes up and gives me a dark look.

"I dreamed you left me for a guy at my office," she tells me, deadpan.

"I would never leave you for a guy," I tell her. "Especially not a guy from the insurance industry."

Ewww.

I pull on some running clothes, grab some jeans and a t-shirt, and speed down to my car. If I get on the highway by 6:30, I'll miss the morning rush and be out at the Chicago Botanic Garden by 7:00. Plenty of time for a run, a Starbucks, and a shower.

I get on the highway and pull into dead-stopped traffic. Huh?

It takes me 55 minutes to travel about four miles. The whole trip -- usually a 30-minute proposition at this hour, covering just shy of 20 miles -- takes an hour and a half. As I pull off the highway I realize I've forgotten to bring a towel. I also realize I need to go to the bathroom, and I'm not talking about the old number one. We're talking the deuce here. Serious. As in, "I can't believe I ate a whole grilled portobello mushroom sandwich yesterday," serious.

I drive by the CVS hoping to find a beach towel. Not open for another 15 minutes. Oy vey. Now what? I'm supposed to be at my desk around 8:00, and here it's after 8:00 and I've yet to run or shower or get coffee or do anything, plus Nature has gone from tapping on my shoulder to grabbing me by the arm and tugging.

I race over to the Botanic Garden and take care of business in the lovely main building. Then I say what-the-hey and have a great run, weaving my way through the Japanese Garden and through the Prairie and around the lake. I jog back to the car and make for CVS. Three beach towels for ten bucks. Perfect. I hit the Starbucks, cruise to my building, spill coffee in my lap, rush through a shower, and make it up to my desk by 9:30. What the heck, I think. All is not lost. I had a good run. I feel refreshed. I count my change from CVS and notice the clerk has charged me $18 for the three towels. I wonder what's next.

I write it all down in this post.

6.07.2004

LAUGHING AT OUR DIFFERENCES: One of the reasons I like Howard Stern is that he shows how it's possible for different races and sexual orientations to get along with each other while still enjoying the richness of our differences. You could say he demonstrates his respect for black people or gay people by refusing to tiptoe around stereotypes and refusing to camouflage his own biases and prejudices. He acknowledges that the topics of race and sexual orientation can make us uncomfortable, and yet he's courageous enough to dance through these dual minefields rather than tiptoe. And, if you listen to the show, most of his minority listeners and guests seem to love him for it.

(On the other hand, for what it's worth, I think much of his ridicule of handicapped folks -- whether they're mentally or physically challenged -- can veer off course and become plain old cruelty.)

I just ran across a fun exchange in my personal life that reminded me of the best of the Stern approach.

One of my best friends is engaged to a black woman. (He's a white guy.)

We were organizing a Belmont pool, betting on the race, and his girlfriend wanted in it. We had three horses apiece for three guys, so the math didn't work out. She was all bent out of shape.

"Why can't I be in?" I heard her begging in the background of the phone call. "Is it because I'm a woman?"

"No," he replied. "It's because you're black. This pool is whites only."

If we could all make these kinds of jokes with one another, the world would be a better place.

6.04.2004

FOUR MORE YEARS: As much as I go on about Bush 43 here, if Slick Willie were to run again I'd vote for him in a second. I got so tickled reading this quick news piece about the kickoff of his MY LIFE book tour, I was grinning ear to ear. Here's a favorite quote from the article:


"A lot of presidential memoirs, they say, are dull and self-serving," the two-term president told a booksellers convention. "I hope mine is interesting and self-serving."

This guy may be far from perfect, and he may have told a few fibs in his day, but at bottom I think I admire him for his honesty. Go figure.

6.03.2004

GABBA GABBA GOP: Turns out there's at least one cool Republican.

6.01.2004

ACCIDENTAL POETRY: My friend Trisha sent me a picture of her son Robbie. He looks very cute, as I told her in my reply. Her response struck me as an (inadvertent) great poem, and so I've formatted it appropriately:

ALWAYS MORE LOVE
He said Mommy yesterday.
I could not love him more.
Ooops, I do.
I do again.

THE ZENMASTER DOES BAGHDAD: My pal Rob looks at the picture (below) of new Iraqi president Ghazi Mashal Ajil al-Yawer standing in front of a portrait of the slain chairman of the Iraqi Governing Council, Izzadine Saleem, and comes up with the quip of the week:

"Why is there a huge picture of Phil Jackson in the background? I hope they vote for him. He really knows how to build a dynasty."


STERN SOFTENING? As I've mentioned, I have terrible mixed emotions about Howard Stern. On the one hand, he's sometimes so breathtakingly funny that I find myself tuning in and hoping for one of those moments. On the other hand, he can be be so heartless and cruel that I feel dirty and wrong for listening.

Some of my favorite things about Howard are that he spotlights the hyocrisy and/or self-importance of celebrities, that he's willing to say something sucks if it sucks, and that he seems to speak his own mind no matter what the consequences. But some of his recent choices suggest this devil-may-care attitude, his me-against-the-system veneer may be on the fade. Today, he ass-kissed the reunited Wilson Phillips on the air. And a few weeks ago he gave the same treatment to Alanis Morrisette. What's next, a tribute to Phil Collins?

5.31.2004

NOT TO MENTION MY FRIENDS BEN & JERRY: Maybe I can blame those ten extra pounds in the past year on my commute.

BADONNA: The Canadian National Post points out how lame Madonna is.

5.28.2004



SPORTING LIFE: Just as my NEW YORKER subscription is about to run out...and just as I'm seriously contemplating *letting it* run out for the first time in maybe six or seven years, they hit me with Ben McGrath's excellent "Project Knuckleball," a meandering examination of the flutterball pitch and the hurlers who live by it. It's a great read if you have a moment (and if you have even a passing interest in sport). As a sports misfit myself (I was a soccer goalie and a breaststroker, both specialties that have long-standing associations with mental imbalance), I found myself dying to go out and perfect my own ghostball. If only I had somebody to throw the ball with. I'm working with my two-year-old on this, but thus far he's much more interested in "backerd" throws than in hitting Daddy in the hands.

(When I saw the Ben McGrath byline on the knuckleball piece it gave me pause at first. Luckily a quick Amazon.com search revealed that the pause-inspiring writer is actually Ben Marcus, the guy who's responsible for one of the most useless novels I've come across in this or any other decade, the appropriately titled po-mo wank-job that is SUPERBAD. Steer clear of Mr. Marcus or, if you like him, please to be explaining to me why.)

In the past couple years, I've found myself investing more time in two seemingly different sports: NASCAR and baseball. NASCAR is my new interest, born of a "just for laughs" fantasy league that, in stealth mode, ignited my passion for redneck racin'. The dynamic nature of the sport -- an entirely new event each weekend, new track, new strategy, new alliances and enemies -- really works for me, as does its inherent patriotism and aw-shucks humility. I thrilled to the 3-D NASCAR IMAX movie on its opening weekend, and I devoured the insider account MEN AND SPEED on a recent vacation.

If NASCAR is my new love, baseball is like a first girlfriend who, after losing track of her, shows up on your doorstep in her same old sundress, the years having done nothing but add magic to her smile. After a few strikes (as in 'work stoppages', not dead-center pitches), I had sort of given up on baseball, had stopped following the free-agent signings and the latest sensations. After realignment, I'd even lost track of which team went where.

But I found I couldn't boycott baseball; it was already too deep in me. I found myself imagining my old baseball cards -- the Ron Santo TRADED card, the way Milt May held the bat like a toothpick, the snapshot of the knuckleballer Wilbur Wood with a dozen fish on a stringer, the sheer gleaming mass of men like George Scott and Willie Stargell, the insouciant leer of the young Dusty Baker. I remembered hearing Jack Brickhouse's "Hey, hey!" and later Harry Caray's malaprops and "Holy Cow" and "Vizza-kye-EE-no!" And over the past two seasons, as my Cubs regained some measure of competitiveness, I jumped back in with both feet. Earlier this year Michael Lewis' excellent MONEYBALL offered me another entry point into the game, showing how my current vocation (research) is changing the game of baseball in grand and subtle ways.

With baseball and NASCAR alike, the more knowledge I gain the more fun it is to watch cars going around in circles and frustrated jocks taking miserable swipes at fluttering ghostballs for three hours at a stretch. What looks slow to some feels exquisite to the initiated. Trust me.

(UPDATE: A quick Googling reveals a cool old Chicago Trib piece on the knuckler, complete with a handy little animated GIF on how to throw it.)

5.27.2004

MCMAHON/CARSON: This CBS News poll shows that a Kerry/McCain ticket runs a great chance of beating Bush/Cheney. (Adding McCain to the ticket doubles Kerry's chances of winning.) I know this holds true for me -- you add McCain, and I'm on board. But I keep thinking: Shouldn't it be McCain/Kerry? I mean, Kerry/McCain is too much like Barney and Fred to me. The wrong guy gets top billing.

MAKE IT HAPPEN AND ROLL OUT: My brother Eric forwards me this link to Snoop Dogg holding forth on an unlikely subject: Ivan Lendl. Love it.

5.24.2004

QUICK HITS: A few interesting things you should be aware of out there:

- Snoop Dogg is getting divorced. Hey, who knew he was married? Somehow I thought making porno movies in your background suggested you weren't yet promised to anyone. Go figure. (Very funny article, by the way. Hat tip to Just Procrastinating for the link.)

- Apparently Bill Cosby is a pretty decent guy. This I'm not surprised by.

- Two different guys gripe about Michael Moore. Apparently he's not such a decent guy. Also no big surprise. Here's the first guy...and the second.

- Is it just me, or do the summer megaconcerts sound like torture? Madonna, for the love of all that is holy, please hang up your pointy bra. Your act is not just tired, it's embarassing. Check out Michael Ventre's light and funny piece on the summer's biggest and dumbest tours.

KNEEJERK RESPONSE AFTER READING A VERY LONG ARTICLE: Wesley Clark for President. (I mean, let's face it: Do you really think W. is capable of contrasting post-Ottoman state socialism with the emergence of Balkan democracies? I wasn't a big Gore fan, but I justified my Gore vote last time around by saying I couldn't vote for a dummy for president. But then came that whole election debacle, and by the time W. was shoehorned into office I was pretty much politic-ed out. Fine, W., you be president. Go ahead, I thought. Who cares? But then the terrorists reminded me that, when bad guys say they're going to kill you, you owe it to yourself to care...and to kick them in the jimmy preemptively. And all of a sudden W. emerged as a first-rate preemptive jimmy-kicker. All of which has had me tilting into W.'s arms for the past coupla years. But then I read Clark's seemingly cogent, insightful analysis, bookened by all manner of war atrocities and bike wrecks, and I'm reminded that a U.S. President oughta have some sense of history to go along with his intuitive understanding of human nature and ultra-low heartbeat. Oh, and he should be smart, too. Right?)

THAT'S WHAT I GET FOR ACTUALLY BUYING MUSIC: Buzzed past Best Buy last week to pick up recent releases from two of my favorite artists, Morrissey and Lloyd Cole. Yes, I'm a child of the eighties. Lloyd has made a few good ones in a row, especially that last one with The Negatives, and Morrissey has this whole massive media push behind him again, so I was nothing if not optimistic about both records. Sadly, five or so days later, I'm not feeling great about either record. The unformed sense that keeps playing in my head is that both guys have come to understand their own brands so well -- Morrissey is the petulant, almost bitchy ne'er-be-happy, and Lloyd is the hopeless romantic with a taste for poetry and red wine -- they almost sound like they're covering themselves.

The production on the Morrissey record is uneven, with one song sounding bright and treble-soaked and the next one awash in guitars and blurry, compressed midrange. Oh, and I can't say I care how Moz feels about American politics, so there's that. He says something like "until the president of the United States is Black or Hispanic or Gay you've got nothing to say to me." Okay, great. Forget about democracy, we'll just appoint a deserving minority. Thanks, Mo!

The Lloyd record is, in a word, subdued. His vocal range seems to have been reduced to four or five notes, and where there was once a kind of piss-and-vinegar attitude we're now left with something more like salad dressing, nicely blended but not so special as a standalone item.

I'm hopeful the new Bee Gees compilation, purchased on the same trip, will deliver more bang for my music-buying buck.

5.20.2004

ON DADHOOD: I've been thinking a lot about fathers and fatherhood of late, which is appropriate since Father's Day is just around the corner.

In a perfect world (or in a major magazine that paid me to do so) I'd write a coherent essay about fatherhood, the various aspects of it that have been swirling around in my brain. But this world is not perfect, I'm sad to report, and so I'll just write aimlessly here on my blog.

(Sigh.)

I saw Moises Alou, he of hand-peeing fame, hit a walk-off home run to beat his father Felipe's S.F. Giants last night. I saw it in-person from nine rows behind the Giants' dugout, thanks to a very good pal with great tickets. Wow, I thought afterwards. Felipe Alou changed pitchers to try and beat his son. He obviously spent time with the new pitcher discussing how best to beat Moises, which weaknesses to exploit. And still, on this night, the son not only bested the father, but he did it in dramatic fashion, the ultimate "You are not the boss of me" blast slicing the night and sending a packed house spilling into the beer gardens of Wrigleyville. How cool for Moises! And, I wondered, is it really so terrible for Felipe to see his son deliver such a heart-stopping, heroic performance? Nah. Can't be. Somewhere, deep inside perhaps, Felipe Alou was beaming. Had to be! (And Moises had to feel a tinge of sadness, too.)

(Holy crap! As I type this Moises has just swatted another one in today's game, tying it up in the seventh inning! Moises!)

What else? I've been thinking back on an overlooked novel I loved, Jonathan Dee's THE LIBERTY CAMPAIGN, in which a father-son subplot lends poignance to a wonderful story about self-knowledge and male friendships. Great book, and I ought to read it again.

And more...

I thought last night about things my father has given me, the many interests and ideas he's sparked in me and that I've carried on...my love for the city of Chicago, its Cubs and Bears...of mystery novels and reading...my simple personal fashion aesthetic, where navy blue and khaki begin and end my color palette...my desire to coach my son's teams and to be present for his athletic triumphs and travails, ala Moises and Felipe...

And then I get to wondering what part of me will filter through to my son...what will stick...

I could write a million words and (hopefully) never say it any clearer than this: Fatherhood -- parenthood -- has added an extra dimension to my life, a richness that I can't imagine how I ever lived without.

So that's what I've been thinking.

5.19.2004

ME AND THE BOY: My brother Casey took this shot (below) with his digital camera. It was a quick thing, not really as posed as it looks, and I think I'm as happy with it as any picture I've ever seen. My son looks so damn adorable to me, and I can even see in myself how thrilled I am to be his dad. (Can you see it?) The picture was taken during our Sanibel vacation, where our extended family came together to check in with one another and to recharge our batteries. Oddly enough my dad thinks I'm nuts for posting pictures of myself on my blog. Perhaps my paternal pride will earn me a free pass on this one.

5.18.2004

FAREWELL FELIX: The deaths of TV icons from my youth always make me sad. Today it's Tony Randall. Some interesting notes from his CNN obit:

- His real name was Leonard Rosenberg! No way! Next thing you know we'll find out uberwasp Ralph Lauren is actually Jewish.
- No mention of his very young wife and child. What gives?
- They note his frequent appearances on THE TONIGHT SHOW, but make no mention of his frequent walk-ons to LATE NIGHT. Huh?
- Funny that he played the first openly gay TV lead, was constantly the subject of innuendo about his sexuality, but managed to bag a hot young wife. (Maybe Kevin Spacey will hook up with the post-Andy Mandy Moore and prove everyone wrong.)

UPDATE: Okay, apparently I saw a very early version of the obit this morning. They've now updated it to include wife/children info, the LATE NIGHT link, etc. And to those who've commented/e-mailed about Ralph Lauren...c'mon give me some credit. I was kidding!)

5.17.2004

IN BEAVER COUNTRY: I'm in Portland this morning for a meeting. Seems like a nice town, almost like a hipper version of Cincinnati. Maybe it's the mountains that up the hip quotient. Oh, and the hippies. There are a lot of hippies here. Of course hippies up the "fragrance" quotient, too, but you gotta take the good with the bad. There's a "clog superstore" across from my hotel. So either the hippies have a serious foothold here, so to speak, or there are a lot of nurses in this neighborhood.

I'm thinking hippie nurses. Huge clog market!

5.13.2004

WHAT I WROTE IN ONE OF THOSE COMP BOOKS YESTERDAY: Still that nagging feeling: Am I doing it right? Is this it?

Nagging, even though I already know the answers...


1) There is no 'right'. And there really isn't any 'I' either.

2) Yes, this is it. Enjoy.

WHAT HAVE I DONE FOR ME LATELY? I got to thinking last night, mulling over the things in my life I'm most proud of. (Maybe I am having a midlife crisis!) My first thoughts were kind of obvious and nice and related (pun intended, and not in any order):

- My son, C.J.
- My marriage to Eileen (nearly 13 years!)
- My relationship with my extended family

Hmmm. Very nice, I thought, but what if I eliminate genetically relevant stuff and just get a little selfish? Stuff I've done, you know?

Here's what came to mind:

- Quitting smoking and dipping
- Completing two AIDS Rides
- Maintaining my friendships

At this point I drew a blank. Sure, there are other things, but many of 'em are so small and seemingly insignificant (coming in second place one year in breaststroke after having to re-swim the finals; finishing my three grad-school applications, even though I didn't get in to any of the programs; etc.) that I'm almost embarassed to list 'em.

Anyhow, this is what I'm thinking about today...achievements...what they are and why they matter.

5.12.2004

POSTPONING MY MIDLIFE CRISIS: I turned 38 yesterday. Given that the average life expectancy in the United States is approximately 77 years, you could make the case that I've reached the halfway point of my life, give or take a few years and barring any untimely cancers, car crashes, or incidences of bioterror in my immediate vicinity. In other words, I've successfully reached the mythical "midlife" we hear so much about and, as a result, can expect to be visited by the attendant "crisis" sometime soon.

Somehow I don't think so.

I was talking to my mother yesterday afternoon. She had called to wish me happy birthday and, as we often do when one of notches another year, we got to talking about how old we both are and about the parallels in our lives. And the differences.

As we were talking, I realized that she had given birth to all three of her boys by the age of 31, whereas my wife had our first child at 36 and will be 39 when she delivers our second.

"I was the old lady," my mom told me, recounting a kindergarten parent conference for my youngest brother Casey, eight years my junior. She went on to describe how she sees grey-haired parents chasing toddlers around airports and thinks they look old enough to be grandparents...only to realize they're the same age as her eldest son...grey-haired me.

It seems that my generation -- or at least the urban folks my wife and I live around in Chicago -- are operating six or eight years behind my parents' generation, getting married a bit later and procreating a bit later. (I'm not sure if this applies to our rural contemporaries or not.) Although many journalists are rallying around the phrase "60 is the new 40," I'm starting to think that's wishful thinking. So on the morning after my 38th birthday, after waking up in my contacts after a glorious sushi dinner in the company of dear friends, I've come up with a rallYing cry that feels right for me:

"38 is the new 30."

Which gives me eight more years before I have to start planning my midlife crisis.

5.10.2004

COLOR ME DEEP BLUE: Yet another totally frivolous and enjoyable online personality profilers:

you are deepskyblue
#00BFFF

Your dominant hues are cyan and blue. You like people and enjoy making friends. You're conservative and like to make sure things make sense before you step into them, especially in relationships. You are curious but respected for your opinions by people who you sometimes wouldn't even suspect.

Your saturation level is very high - you are all about getting things done. The world may think you work too hard but you have a lot to show for it, and it keeps you going. You shouldn't be afraid to lead people, because if you're doing it, it'll be done right.

Your outlook on life is very bright. You are sunny and optimistic about life and others find it very encouraging, but remember to tone it down if you sense irritation.
the spacefem.com html color quiz


(I'm a sucker for anything that's about me and positive. Every time I get a favorable fortune cookie I wrestle with the idea of having it framed.)

SURVIVORAMA: Some quick thoughts from last night's SURVIVOR ALL-STARS finale:

- Rupert will walk away with the extra million, but I voted for Colby. The guy deserved it the time he gave it away to Tina, and he was once again awesome on this show. That said, I love Rupert. He's great, too. He's in the now, as they say.

- Sure, the show is manipulative, cheap, etc., but I love it, and I also think it's a great learning/teaching tool. I learned so much about grace under pressure just watching this show. I think stress does reveal peoples' true character. No matter how you slice it, I think Big Tom looks like an idiot. And for all this talk about what a "great girl" Jerri is, two shows' worth of SURVIVOR suggests otherwise.

- I'm definitely with the "it's just a game" crowd. My wife and I sat there and marveled at lecturing Lex and blubbering Big Tom and crying Kathy. (Of course we were also amazed that the clueless ShiAnn actually seemed to *get it* for once.)

- Alicia and Amber look worse in all the makeup. Kathy and Jenna looked much better. Jerri demonstrates how a bad personality can turn a hot girl ugly.

- Most of the contestants looked way hotter to me super-skinny than they do more full of face. I don't know what this says about me or how it relates to the fact that low-calorie diets supposedly help you live longer.

- Jeff Probst is spooky. That shot of him hanging out of the helicopter and then making the "take it down" hand gesture (as if he was in control of the landing) was so over the top I could barely stand it.

- I also agreed strongly with Jenna's admonition to Rob and Amber to stop apologizing and to revel in a job well done.

- Lex seems like a cool guy in so many ways. But the bottom line is he's about a forty-year-old guy with a mohawk, a ton of piercings and tattoos...and undoubtedly some big-ass issues.

5.07.2004

WHAT'S A BLOG? I recently told a friend to check out my blog, this Blind Camel thing you're reading right now.

"What's a blog?" asked my friend.

A day later over lunch another friend described his fledgling company's new product, an innovative product for adding relevant advertising (among other things) to RSS- or Atom-enabled (syndicated) blogs.

Two different days, two different friends, two different levels of blog awareness.

Trouble is, sometimes I forget that the mass of folks have more in common with my first friend than my second. If you're reading this blog right now, you're part of a relatively small (albeit growing) group. And if you understood that stuff about syndication, you're breathing still more rareified air.

One recent study reported that 11 percent of Internet users visit blogs written by others, and between two and seven percent of adult Internet users in the U.S. write their own blog. (And of that group, only 10 percent actually update their blog on a daily basis.)

I wonder if that's more or less people than are still buying and reading literary fiction? Poetry?

I betcha more people read blogs than read poetry.

What am I on about today?

Well, I'm in wondering mode. Wondering about how big this blogging phenomenon will get. Wondering about if the metastory about blogging should be more about 'vehicle' than content.

Right now, I'd bet most of us who "blog" and read blogs think of blogging as something largely personal, confessional, homespun, and cute. But what if a blog -- that is, a template-driven, actively updated content experience that typically arises from a singular POV or reason-for being (even if it's created by more than one person) -- is really an early incarnation of next-generation narrowcasting, a sort of Christopher Columbus for exploring how content creators can match up with their audiences and create real and ongoing customer relationships (to use a hackneyed business phrase). In other words, if I'm a big fan of Bob Mould, then maybe I'll want to subscribe to his blog, which will be the central point of distribution for his writing, his music, his merchandise, and the scheduling of his live performances. In other words, Bob's blog (or Andrew Sullivan's or even BlogCritics) will be the nexus at which you can enter into various value exchanges with one another, minus the mediation of a record label, a publisher, etc. Am I making sense? (Perhaps I'm stretching with the BlogCritics cite. When RSS enables you to be your own aggregator, who needs another layer of middleman?)

Our first collective attempt at creating the next generation of online content was corporate and money-driven and, as such, it missed the power of the medium. Blogging is the tip of the personal and creative next wave, a lurking iceberg that is arising from our passions and our needs.

"What's a blog?" Good question, I say.

5.06.2004

GIVE UP: The older I get the more life feels like it knows what it's doing. Sure, day to day, life is a mess. Even week to week. Hell, maybe even year to year. But somehow this mystical "grand scheme of things" you hear people talking about...well, the older I get, the more I buy into it. And the nice thing about feeling this way is I get to just sort of give up, to lay back in life's big arms and enjoy the ride. At least that's how I feel today.

5.04.2004

LISTEN WHILE YOU WORK: If you ever have a lot of work to do and you just want some beautiful, chill-out music on in the background...some stuff that'll set your head right, calm you down, and seep into the cracks between the work and your blues...try out Joe Pass's incomparable SONGS FOR ELLEN. One man, one guitar. Quite lovely.

AERIAL POETRY: A while back I mentioned I'd been writing more poetry of late. Not too long ago I wrote one I really like. Here it is, for your enjoyment (I hope):

Other Invisible Winds
When I’m on an airplane is it life
that is flying by
along with the landscape?

Is it only
the scenery receding?
Is this me missing
my son and my wife,
or worse --
am I also hovering
beyond the dying
intersection of our time
together in this life?

It could be
this is how love works,
all this floating above
the gaps in time and space,
still staying aloft and held
together even far apart
by unseen hands
or other invisible winds.

5.03.2004

LEMME HEAR YA... I've been bitching about my COMMENT function for eons without doing anything about it. And a month or so ago I wondered how to get more readers, how to get more satisfaction and recompense from this weird blogging thing. Seems to me the two items are related. Seems like I oughta fix the COMMENTS feature so as to better engage those readers I do have, thereby generating greater stickiness and interest. Also seems like the recomponse I get right now comes from the feedback I get from readers (you!) more than anything, so how dumb is it to have the COMMENTS thing be all broken for so long.

And so I've fixed it, so that you can comment and I can comment back. Hope this works, you enjoy, etc. Love to hear from you, as always.

(Until I get all popular, when I'll have no way to keep up with all y'all, but then you'll just talk amongst yourselves then anyhoo.

STILL NOT HATING CHRIS: Regular Camel readers know I've been encouraging Chris at EveryoneHatesMe to love himself and his life a little more. There's something about Chris I find hilarious and loveable and so I follow his writing and his various plights (losing weight, finding a job, trying to drink less, etc.). Most of the time I think Chris's troubles are everyone's troubles, it's just that he has the balls to talk about them, write about them, etc. But Chris's most recent post suggests he has some issues most of us do not. An excerpt:


A couple of months ago I ran off to Mexico. I was out of my head, and was not thinking clearly. So, I drove to El Paso, TX and crossed the border there. I was never so scared in my life. I ended up driving non-stop from Chicago. I was having a nervous breakdown.

Anyway, it must have been the lack of sleep. I thought people could read my thoughts. I had some dental work done on a tooth years eariler, and was convinced that there was a transmitter implanted in the tooth at the rear of my mouth. So, I stumbled around the Mexico border town and wandered into a dentist office. I had the tooth extracted.

I'll admit, my first instinct is to laugh. And somehow from what I gather of Chris's personality, I'm sure he sees a bit of the humor in this. After all, he *is* the guy whose blog "About" statement reads "I am 31, fat, loosing my hair, living with my parents and I am poor." A pathetic statement, to be sure, and yet naming your blog EveryoneHatesMe and airing your dirtiest laundry in such bald (excuse the pun) fashion suggests a guy who's not afraid to poke a little fun at himself, to allow other a vicarious window into his travails.

My next instinct is to worry about Chris. My God, what a nightmare! But then, I don't really know Chris. I only stumbled past his blog one day, maybe linked from ChicagoBloggers.com, if memory serves. How much should I worry about someone I don't know? After all, aren't there people in my day-to-day life who need and deserve my attention more than Chris? Of course.

The bottom line: If you have a moment, blow by EveryoneHatesMe and say a nice word or two to Chris. He's suffering, and he could use whatever spare support you have to offer.

DOING IT RIGHT IN THE MODERN WORLD: Maybe 25 years ago my Chicago grandmother came to visit our family in Ohio. Gramma, as we called her, had lived downtown her whole life, and so she seemed wide-eyed at much of our medium-small town existence.

Her greatest and most celebrated fish-out-of-water moment of the trip came at McDonald's. She stood back from the counter, pondering the menu, mouthing the various item names and furtively (and, of course, futilely) scanning for the "cocktail" section. Finally she stepped forward, ready to order:

"I'll have a cheeseburger, hon, medium rare, and a baked potato."

The needle dragged across the record. The counter-simp stifled a smirk. All around her, patrons gaped and mumbled. I distinctly remember a young boy around my age repeating it to his parents. "She said medium RARE!" And another: "She said baked potato!"

Meanwhile my brothers and I shrunk into the bright yellow and orange scenery, denying our genetic link to the woman who -- gasp -- didn't know how to order at McDonald's! (Today I realize it's a small miracle she didn't ask for a patty melt, compounding our horror.)

I had such a moment again this morning. Standing at Starbuck's, my automaton-like order at the ready ("tallsoylatteandicedlemonloafpoundcakeplease"), my money pre-counted, I found myself behind an older couple (they were maybe 58). He was dressed like a banker or an undertaker, with his hair meticulously wetted and sloped across his pale skull; she resembled an attractive young blonde secretary from the movies, although her face and her clothes and her hair were not new enough, not to mention altogether too pressed.

"One coffee," the undertaker intoned, his zen-like understatement drawing quizzical glances from the baristas.

"Are these pastries fresh, dear?" asked the old young secretary.

Meanwhile all around them the clued-in sighed and shuffled, wondering how it was possible in this day and age not to have your Starbuck's order down pat.

Somewhere I'm sure Gramma felt vindicated.

4.30.2004

EXCUSED ABSENCE? A responsible blogger would have told his readers he's vacationing on Sanibel Island (off the coast of Ft. Myers) for a week and, surrounded by his extended family, unlikely to spend much time online let alone blogging. Thus far it's been a very relaxing melange of naps, Red Wings playoffs games, Cubs games, crappy paperbacks, and water-related hijinks. I'm tan above the waist, burned below it. Sounds dirty, but it's really not that exciting. Forgot to lather my legs and feet, so I'm half bronzed-man, half lobster-man.

4.15.2004

WHO DOES HE THINK HE IS? So Dr. Evil is offering a truce to Europe, eh? How big of him. I can already hear Chirac's "thank you, Dr. Evil" from here.

4.14.2004

SEXY SAVANT: I'm with Howard Mortman. When it comes to 9/11, Britney Spears gets it better than Norman Mailer.

4.12.2004

CJ@2: My son C.J. turned two years old yesterday. As I wrote in his birthday card, no child has ever been more loved or more lovable. Sounds hokey, and I'm reminded of a Bill Hicks bit that mocked parents who thought their kids were somehow special. But the thing is, kids are special, every last one of them. Go ahead, have a kid and look in his or her eyes, and then try and say otherwise.

And when we realize we were all children once, well, then, there must be some residual specialness in all of us, right? Somewhere?

NOW I'LL APOLOGIZE: As usual my pal Bart makes a lot of sense (below) and reminds me that "Raze Fallujah" is diametrically opposed to why I originally thought this war was a good idea. The combination of an oppressed people and a horrible despot harboring WMD seemed to me to create a defensible case for military action. But as Bart argues below, there's the problem of no WMD and a less-than-"grateful" band of "liberated" Iraqis who are overwhelming their supposed liberators. Once again I'll give Bart the floor:


"Tonight I have a message for the brave and oppressed people of Iraq: Your enemy is not surrounding your country -- your enemy is ruling your country. (Applause.) And the day he and his regime are removed from power will be the day of your liberation. (Applause.)" George W. Bush 2003 State of the Union

Scott- I have to admit, I'm horribly disappointed. Damnit, this is what a hell of a lot of us were arguing 15 months ago - there was never a question that the US army would roll over what was left of the Iraqi army. The questions instead were related to what was to me a hell of a lot more important: will this war actually make the United States (and its allies) safer? Is there a plan to actually accomplish the goals we set forth prior to invasion , absent the roses in the street welcoming party that was promised? Given the complexity and flexibility of the terrorist groups we are fighting, is the lack of international cooperation that is sure to follow this invasion worth the potential security of removing a despot? In retrospect it seems quite clear that the answer to all three question was no. The pro-invasion chorus was consistently "things will work out fine - are you willing to suffer another 9/11?" Well, damnit, now the chickens are home to roost and the pro-war voices have moved pretty quickly from "we need to take him out to protect our country" to "did you see the mass graves? Are you pro-Saddam?" to "the motherfuckers don't appreciate what we're giving 'em -fuck em all let's raze the city and get the hell out." I hope you don't mind me pointing out the incredible hypocrisy of this argument. If we fought this war to make our country safer I can't think of a more effective way of recruiting poeple to blow themselves up in our bases, buildings and homes than dropping a Dresden on an Islam holy city where, right or wrong, the whole uprising started after our shutting down of a freely published newspaper. All the humanitarian justifications I heard seem to have droppen by the wayside as well (Over 600 dead Iraqi's in the last week - I know Saddam was bad but I doubt that families were losing 600 a week in only one city).

I'm not trying to defend the inhuman and despicable acts that have happened over the past week. All I'm doing is pointing out that is a war that we chose to enter - there was no imminent threat to our national security, there was no connection to Al-Quaeda (although it sure as hell is there now, along with every other chicken shit terrorist organization signing up every orphaned son who last their father to a US bomb). We built this shithole because a fucked-up administration felt that God had touched them to lead the world to their vision of heaven and like a lot of people who are convinced that they have the one and only true answer they found themselves swimming in a world of shit. Power carries reponsibility and razing towns and pulling out of a country we helped arm and then destroy promises nothing but more and more death for both countries. I screamed against this damn war, not because it was wrong but because we went about it all wrong. The costs are only going to grow higher, I'm afraid, but the costs of leaving will be even greater. GWB started a fire certain that he could contain it and his error in judgment could very well cost us all far more than we ever thought.

4.10.2004

RAZE FALLUJAH: I won't lie to you, nor will I apologize for this: I saw a crazed Iraqi on the cover of this morning's New York Times joyfully displaying the boots of an American serviceman. They were apparently snatched from the soldier after his convoy was bombed. And I immediately thought, Raze Fallujah. Full steam war, no polite occupation and roadblocks, but full-on bombs and disaster, shock and awe all over again. Look, I'm not proud of myself, but I bet those images are doing more to bolster Bush than to hurt him. I was reminded of the section in Tom Friedman's FROM BEIRUT TO JERUSALEM where talks about (if memory serves) "Hama Rules," that unwritten code of leadership in the Middle East that the only way to rein in fundamentalist zealots is to unleash broad and brutal measures, like what Syrian president Hafez al-Assad did when he literally leveled the city of Hama. Nice, via Google: A link to a Friedman column on same.

And meanwhile, how to reconcile my recent and zealous pro-military stance with my expanding Buddhist reading and practice? If I am containing multitudes then I think those multitudes themselves are at war...or maybe just balancing one another.

4.07.2004

SELF-PLEASURING IS GOOD FOR YOU: As my good pal Rob writes, "It's comforting to know that if you stick with a hobby long enough good things happen."

4.06.2004

RYAN VS. OBAMA = BUSH VS. NOT BUSH? So I've started piecing together the differences between Obama and Ryan, and there seem to be many. I'm hoping to do a helpful side-by-side comparison on the issues in this space at some point. Believe it or not, and I trust some of you will choose NOT, I'm still undecided.

In the meantime, I did find this Sun-Times editorial (penned by Thomas Roeser) reprinted on Ryan's website, and I think the distinction he makes -- that Ryan will stand by Bush and his war whereas Obama will not -- may be the deciding factor for me, not to mention the rest of IlliNoise. In fact it's quite possible that all the House and Senate races in '04 become referendums on Bush, moreso than unique local contests. I'm sure ace strategists are already considering this scenario. Duh.

4.05.2004

CUBS WIN! The good guys take their first game. I'm so dang happy it's baseball season again.

4.01.2004

HANDSOME SMART BLACK GUY VS. HANDSOME SMART WHITE GUY: So yes, I'm back. Sort of. And one of the things I want to focus on in the weeks to come is the Illinois Senate race. My dear friend and provocateur Bart issued an opening salvo below in my mysterious and lame comment box. I'm reposting it here, to kick us off:


...as of right now it's looking pretty clear that Barack Obama is going to be the Dem nominee going against Jack Ryan on the GOP side. I have to admit that the Dem campaign wasn't exactly riveting political drama but it really seemed to me from pretty early on that Obama had a hell of a resume to run on, if maybe a little bit short in actual government experience. When Blair Hull ran into his personal iceberg (and let's face it, the guy was pretty damn creepy to begin with and throwing his kids all over the back page of the Trib didn't help) it just seemed like Obama was ready to grab the torch. His take on the positions are pretty relevant: pro use of force, anti Iraq (primarily the unilateralism, not necessarily the cause), pro-Israel, commited to a multi-lateral approach in regards to the war on terror, and committed to free trade (albeit while kowtowing to the Dem base in terms of promoting "minimum rigths for workers around the world"). He's also solidly on the gay rights side of the fence in a state that despite it's downstate advocates is pretty clearly in the live and let live camp. Jack Ryan could be a formidable candidate but he has several pretty distinct disadvantages going into the race: his name is Ryan in a state that hasn't been friendly to it lately (thanks George!), he will be forced to take a fairly hard right stand on issues (gay rights, PATRIOT act, Iraq, abortion) that don't play so well, all the while fighting what really appears to be a fairly strong groundswell against the policies of GWB. It should be a good contest with distinct choices; in the end I think that's good for Illinois. I recognize this hs nothing to do with the post, I just wanted to see if I couldn't get a little discusson going...

Bart, I'm looking forward to exploring and discussing with you. Let's see what we can learn.

ME MIA: Where have I been? Traveling like a beast. I'm in L.A. right now, camped out in a wired Starbucks across the street from CAA. The place is full of Beverly Hills cops, a mix of uniforms and detectives. They're as clean-cut and polite in real life as they were in the Eddie Murphy movie.

Later today I'm giving a presentation to the General Hospital writing team. Fun!

I wrote a new poem on the plane yesterday, and I'm quite proud of it. I'll post it here once I've had a chance to give it a more thorough once-over. Sometimes inspiration at 37,000 feet can look a little less gilded on the ground.

3.18.2004

LITTLE BUDDHISTS: Here's something to lift my spirits, an e-mail from my nephews (typed by their grandmother):


hiuncle scott (cott), per stevie. how is c j? i'm at grandmas house. i went to the fire station. i love you.
- david hess and steven

All little kids are Buddhists, aren't they?

MUDDLE: A month or two ago I was reminded how bad it feels to be sick, to get the flu. Now I'm reminded that lack of sleep is insidious, that it can make a man crazy, and that it feeds on itself, so that when you stop getting sleep for a while it becomes all the harder to get to sleep the next day and the next day.

Meanwhile two good friends are kicking cancer's ass, so I'm also reminded how minor my challenges are, and how a little fatigue is not the end of the world.

I've gotta jump in the shower now, see if I can't blast some sense back into this brain.

3.14.2004

NOT RIGHT WITHOUT: My wife and son are in Florida with my parents. And apparently they're all having a ball. This is great, and it makes me happy to know they're happy, all of 'em. Each of the few times my wife and son have left me for any period of time, I always find myself looking forward to their departure, imagining all the leisure time I'll have in their absence. And usually within 24 to 48 hours I'm miserable, I miss them so much. I look at my son's picture and I almost want to cry. I know this is silly, and I don't cry. But it's like I almost hunger for his return. And my wife? I don't sleep right when she's gone. I sleep, but I don't relax. I fret my way through the night, tossing and turning and kicking her side of the bed hoping to hit something.

3.13.2004

INTO THE MYSTIC: I'm still having fun with my goofy camera phone. A couple nights ago I snapped a shot in my darkened car as I drove my hour-long commute home. The sparse light kind of had a cool effect. Check it out:

STOP SINGING LIKE THAT: We all have little innocuous things that, for some inexplicable reason, just drive us nuts. Don't we? Okay, I do. And one of 'em seems to be gaining in popularity of late: It's that flugeling motion singers make with their fingers wrapped around the microphone, like they're playing a run on the trumpet. Man does that chap my butt when I see it. I can't like a singer who does that. I'm also no fan of syllable adding, like when a singer takes a word like "you" and makes it into "yew-eww-uh-ooo-woo-hoo-uh" or some variation thereof. Or when they turn "and the land of the free" into "and the la-hand, uh-wuh-uh-huh-uh-huv...thuh fuh-ree-hee-ee-ee-eeyee-hee!"

3.11.2004

MISSING THE BOAT TO LAKE WOBEGON: I may have swerved rightward in the past year or so, but I'm still a Garry Trudeau fan and I think Al Franken is damn funny. So when I read that the pair had dinner with Garrison Keillor last December in a kind of lefty humorists summit conference, I found myself wondering something I've wondered often in the past: Have I completely missed the boat on Keillor? Am I too young for Keillor? Is that it? Or does he have fans under forty? Or he is just not that great, a kind of Larry King or Jay Leno in his field, wildly popular for no discernible reason? Anybody out there read him and like him? What am I missing?

3.10.2004

KERRY/MCCAIN? My brother Eric e-mailed me a link to a story suggesting the possibility of a Kerry/McCain bipartisan ticket. My first reaction is excitement, because like my brother I have an unusual affection for McCain. I've somehow come to the conclusion, likely naive, that he is above politics, or is at the very least more in tune with my own personal politics (he's a hawk, soft on some social issues, plain-spoken, etc.). My second reaction is there's no way this ticket happens, because McCain is a Republican and we just don't have split tickets in this country in this time. My third reaction is jeez, why should a star like McCain have to play second fiddle to FrankenKerry? I don't have a fourth reaction yet, but I'll work on it.

Okay, here's my fourth reaction: I love this quote...


"It's impossible to imagine the Democratic Party seeking a pro-life, free-trading, non-protectionist, deficit hawk," the senator told ABC's "Good Morning America" during an interview about illegal steroid use. "They'd have to be taking some steroids, I think, in order to let that happen."

3.09.2004

LONG LIVE THE EIGHTIES: Wow, a new Tears for Fears record with both the original dudes (Roland and Chris) on it. Excellent! Now if only The Smiths would get back together (which the article says ain't gonna happen).

YOUNG MC: In the winter I have a habit of wearing a ski hat around the house in the evenings. My next-door neighbor tells me I look like a schizophrenic. I prefer to think I look a bit street, like maybe I'm an underground rapper or a slacker-snowboarder. Sure, the reality is I look like a 37-year-old man who wishes he was a little cooler and a little younger. The good news is I'm my two-year-old son's hero, and so he likes to swipe the hat off my head and put it on his own dome. Here's what that looks like:

WISH YOU WERE HERE: Teenagers tell of life in the Guantanamo prison camp. (When normal day-to-day life in your country is worse than being helicoptered to a remote prison, that's pretty rough.)

3.08.2004

INCOMING: I'm currently averaging 28 unique visits/day. (The number seems to vary between 25 and 30 from week to week.) This is not much traffic, in the grand scheme of things. Still, I know bloggers who get five visitors a day if they're lucky, so I'm not griping. How to get more traffic, and why I even care...these are big questions I should try to answer.

STERN TO SATELLITE? My brother Eric and I have been swatting e-mails back and forth about Howard Stern's impending demise. I like Eric's thinking in his last e-mail (one thing about Eric, he always sounds like he knows what he's talking about), and so I share it here with you (with his permission). Here's Eric:


I listened to Stern this morning too.. the show content is now lost in his whining (must admit though that I laughed when he realized Tom was in the studio and said (with no anger), “What are you doing in here? Go have your discussion with one of the interns. You come when I call for you.” -- Tom obeyed).

Howard was going off on the Parent Council something-or-other lady on MSNBC. But then went on a rant about stem cells, the Patriot Act, Iraq.. etc. Many things he supported Bush on and now he’s flailing away. [ed. note: Eric and I have been discussing what a wussy Stern is...as soon as his livelihood is threatened he drops Bush and starts finding all manner of things wrong with him, stuff he was willing to forgive only a month or so ago when he was a big Bush fan.)

He should take his show to XM.. they’ll pay handsomely. It’s the radio equivalent of cable right now. No regulation. People pay for it. He can do what he wants. And he will single-handedly bring about a quantum shift in over the air radio. “Free” radio needs guys like Stern. If all of ‘em went to satellite, the audience would completely splinter (just like it did with cable TV).

This is Howard’s destiny, but he’s too scared to take the step. He still thinks this is just good radio fodder (the FCC hates me.. I’m through) If you listened before his last contract renewal, he played the same cards. I don’t think this will blow over anymore.

COMMUNICATIONS HALL OF FAME: Submitted by my pal Sean Baenen:


PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti - U.S. Marines shot and killed a gunman during an outbreak of shooting at a weekend demonstration by Haitians celebrating the ouster of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, a spokesman said Monday.

Col. Charles Gurganus said the shooting occurred near one corner of the presidential National Palace when a Marine platoon observed two gunmen. One was killed, while the troops did not know what happened to the other, he said.

Asked how he knew the man killed was a gunman, Gurganus said: "He had a gun, and he was shooting at Marines. That's what I call a gunman."

WHO'S IN YOUR SIGHTS? Not sure how you should vote in 11 months or so? Here's a helpful site, thanks to my pal Dave at just procrastinating. For the record, I'm scored as a "Typical Democrat" likely to vote for John Kerry. Could be.

BATTLE OF THE BLOGWORLD NON-STARS: You may recall I've got a fitness grudge against fellow blogger Dick Costolo. To recap: Homeboy Costolo can do 78 pushups, 44 Navy Seal situps (yes, he's improved from when I originally posted), and 18 wide-grip pullups. This morning I tested myself and came up short: 60 pushups, 40 Navy Seal situps, and 0 wide-grip pullups (no way was I gonna try any after the pushups -- will have to set this mark another day, but I know I'll max at around eight right now). Granted, I did all this after a 30-minute run, but I'll be honest. I ran really slow, and there's no way I could've done more than that even if I had just come off a massage and lots of rest. So Costolo owns me right now, I'll admit it. But his day will come.

3.05.2004

BUSH'S ERROR OF CERTITUDE: Andrew Sullivan and my pal Bart both point to an excellent Will Saletan piece on Slate. Check it out.

3.04.2004

BART REPLIES: A few posts ago, my pal Bart and I were trying to make sense of W.'s disdain for same-sex marriage. Anyhow, Bart has just weighed in (within the netherworld of my "Comments" feature) with some new thoughts, and I think they're sound enough to deserve a broader airing. I'm not going to bother picking through his words this time. I'll simply say he and I are more on the same page than not right now, and I respect his even tone. So...here's Bart (with extremely mild editing/formatting for easier reading):


Scott, I feel your pain. It is tremendously difficult for anyone with an intelligent, informed viewpoint to find a person or party to support. Unfortunately the apathetic response of "they all suck" inevitably leads to even greater lunacy which means that like or it not those who choose to educate ourselves must grip our nose tightly and wade deeper into the pile of shit that passes for political debate these days.

Regarding your response to my post I can't disagree with your contention that all people make decisions beased upon reasonable cost - I just dispute what the equation is actually based on. I tend to agree with you that Bush is not sitting up at night calculating political variables - like him or not, Bush is clearly a man of great principle. He decides upon a course of action and follows through regardless of the potential cost to him or others -he does what he thinks is right. This is what served him so well in the months after 9/11. However the same attribute that is so effective in war (in many ways a black or white issue - especially in Afghanistan people truly were for or against us)can be a tremendous detriment when it comes to more nuanced situations (arguably almost every other challenge that we've dealt with as a nation). Clinton, for all of his many faults, was unbelievably adept at recognizing the various sides of an issue and working to resolve them in ways that would allow all sides to claim at least partial victory. This is one of the main reasons that many hard core conservatives hated him so passionately- in their eyes America demeaned istelf whenever it adopted a position that was anything other than 100% pro-american (I am overgeneralizing, of course, but damnit this post is already too long). George Bush works much more decisively - his support for the FMA fits this pattern perfectly. In his worldview homosexuality=bad, christianity =good, therefore FMA. The fact that it is completely at odds with his expressed conservative bent never enters the equation.

In my mind the true greatness of this country lies in its long established core principles: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. In my mind we went to war in Afghanistan not only to protect our borders but to protect our way of life from a group of people who would run rough-shod over all that I hold most important: men (and it is all men) who would proscribe for me my type of worship, who would tell me how, when and where I should gather, who would argue that religion trumps science (Georgia Board of Education, anyone?), who would limit the potential of my daughter or sister or wife to advance in her chosen field, who would choose to marginalize people based solely upon their choice of religion, or nationality, or skin color, or sexual orientation, who would hold back social progress because it doesn't fir into their particular world view. That is what I am willing to fight against and that is unfortunately what am I seeing happening in my own country. People who have sworn to uphold the Constitution are instead using it as a political tool and that to me is damn close to criminal. I don't agree with everything that the democrats stand for but if it's a choice between paying an extra 5% a year in taxes or having John Ashcroft decide how I should live my life well for me the answer is simple. The most important thing that I have is my self-determination and everytime I see this administration ham-handedly try to reduce it reminds me again and again why I'll do everything that I can to make certain that W is a one term president.

IPOD SAY: Still iPod crazy, so here's another "next ten songs on random" mix, followed by a fun narrative:

  • "Smack My Bitch Up," The Prodigy
  • "Hear Me Lord," George Harrison
  • "I Wish My Baby Was Born," Uncle Tupelo
  • "The Murder Mystery," The Velvet Underground
  • "DJed," Tortoise
  • "Here," Pet Shop Boys
  • "Django," Rancid
  • "Janet Jangle," High Llamas
  • "Johnny Appleseed," NoFX
  • "Suffocation," The Pulsars

    We open on a man on the edge of disaster. (Hmmm, not unlike my last story. Am I projecting something onto these songs? Rorschachian, perhaps?) He lives in squalor, he's in a broken relationship. Still, after a horrible incident, possibly related to domestic violence, we see him seeking forgiveness, a path to repentance, forgiveness...a future. We learn that his partner -- wife, girlfriend, whatever -- is not blameless, that he actually has a good heart, has seen a future with this person. He's considering all options. He's desperate. He's nearly insane. He goes to a club. He takes drugs, maybe some acid, has some drinks. Hallucinates, passes out against a wall. He starts to come out of it, wakes up as the cleaning crew is poking around him. As the sun is offering its first promise of morning, our man in trouble finds some hope, realizes where he has to go, how he needs to live. By draining himself completely, wrecking himself, he's emptied himself of his pain. He picks up a head of steam, decides to bury his past and start anew. All of a sudden he feels lighter, almost airy. He hatches a plan to build something, to renew his commitment to a project that has long lain dormant. "Suffocation" comes up under the credits, a sort of light look at how tough life and love are. We feel a sense of relief and empathy with our main character as he faces his new life...

    I'm tellin' ya, these songs tell that story all on their own.

  • 3.03.2004

    MAKING STORIES WITH MY MUSIC: Like I said last post, I'm lovin' my iPod, mostly because it makes the most awesome random mixes, stuff I could never come up with. I'll share more. Here are the next 10 random tracks on my iPod:

  • "It Could Have Been a Brilliant Career," Belle & Sebastian
  • "Side of the Road," Beck
  • "Pink Chanel," The Aluminum Group
  • "Anytown," Everything But the Girl
  • "If Not For You," George Harrison
  • "Ivory Coast," Rancid
  • "When the Night Falls," The Pooh Sticks
  • "The Crying of Lot G," Yo La Tengo
  • "All Countries," Tristeza
  • "A Pistol for Paddy Garcia," The Pogues

    Wow. I mean, this is a great brainstorming tool! It suggests a narrative. Let's see...

    Guy gets disillusioned, goes on a bender, has an affair with an older woman, rethinks his whole life. He remembers the woman that had almost saved him, the town that he used to love. Hmmm. "Ivory Coast" comes out of nowhere. He's watching CNN? Uh...he gets a phone call from his younger brother in the Persian Gulf. Yeah. He goes out for a walk, he gains perspective. He realizes he's still in love with the woman, but that he has nothing to offer her. He dreams of travel, thinks maybe he'll go to Spain. He buys a copy of "The Sun Also Rises" and we see him walk into the horizon, melting against the first rays of morning sun.

    Howzat?

  • 3.02.2004

    BIG APPLE: Broadcasting live and wireless from a Big Apple Starbucks, I am. A quick meeting in the city, then back out to LaGoo.

    I've been iPod crazy of late, rippin' 10 GBs inside of a month. On random, here are the next ten songs that come up:

  • "Mister Butterfly," The Aluminum Group
  • "Night Air," Tortoise
  • "Lazing on a Sunday Afternoon," Queen
  • "Save You," The Pulsars
  • "Hey Ya!" Outkast
  • "Kije's Ouija," The Free Design
  • "High on the Chalk," The High Llamas
  • "Ms. Lazarus," Hum
  • "Smiley," The Hangups
  • "You Take Me Up," The Thompson Twins

    You gotta love it!

    Funny thing: After an hour in Starbucks, I've noticed they play some great music. So why can't I "grab" a song or two out of the ethers and pull 'em down onto my music device? I'm sitting here with a live wireless connection, they've got billing info on me. I should be able to find out who played the last track (a great, burning Americana ballad) and, if I want, buy the darn thing here and now. And I can't. Heck, I can't even get the baristas to find out who it was. Silly baristas.

  •